By
·
2 minute read
One of the hardest things about being a leader is knowing the right level at which to operate and make decisions. Leaders have often come up through the ranks due to their technical prowess, and there can be a strong pull to be involved in the details as 1) that is their comfort zone and 2) they have the experience to back it up.
As a leader, though, it's imperative that you operate and make decisions at the appropriate level and an appropriate cadence. Operating too high or low can cause confusion and bottlenecks, ultimately causing work to slow down or crawl.
Let's examine the different levels within any organisation. Identifying the level appropriate for your work is the first step towards knowing the right level to lead your teams. The time horizon associated with the level should indicate how far out you should look for appropriate decisions.
Once you have chosen the appropriate level, it's time to delve into the debate between macromanagement and micromanagement and how they shape team dynamics. Understanding the distinction between these two leadership approaches and applying them appropriately is crucial for leaders who foster a productive and motivated workforce.
Micromanagement: A Closer Look
Micromanagement is characterised by a leader controlling or being overly involved in the minutiae of their teams' activities. While attention to detail can be beneficial in certain scenarios, such as training new employees or managing high-risk projects, consistent micromanagement can stifle creativity and initiative among team members. It often leads to decreased morale, higher stress levels, and reduced overall team effectiveness. Further, it positions the leader as a bottleneck to teams getting work done.
When leaders lean in to their teams, the team leans back, waiting to be told or get permission. When leaders lean back, the team leans in, being proactive and taking responsibility.
- David Marquet, Turn the Ship Around
The Shift to Macromanagement
In contrast, macromanagement focuses on a broader perspective. Leaders who adopt this style trust their teams to understand and manage the details of their work independently. Macromanagement involves setting clear objectives, providing necessary resources, and then stepping back to allow team members to use their skills and judgment to achieve these goals. This approach empowers employees by giving them autonomy and accountability and frees up leaders to focus on strategic planning and organizational growth at their level.
Empowering Teams: The Benefits of Macromanagement
- Enhanced Innovation: Leaders foster an environment ripe for innovation and creative problem-solving by empowering employees to make decisions.
- Increased Productivity: Teams operate more efficiently when they are trusted to manage their workload without constant oversight.
- Improved Morale and Job Satisfaction: Autonomy and trust are significant drivers of job satisfaction, which can lead to lower turnover rates and a more committed workforce.
- Leadership Focus: Macromanagement allows leaders to devote time to strategic growth opportunities, stakeholder engagement, and future planning, rather than getting bogged down in daily operations.
Finding the Balance
Effective leadership requires knowing when to dive deep and when to step back. While micromanagement can be necessary for specific, typically short-term, scenarios, consistently practising macromanagement can lead to a more empowered and proactive team. Leaders should aim to:
- Communicate clear expectations and the reasoning behind decisions.
- Build trust through consistent and fair interactions.
- Encourage open communication and provide regular, constructive feedback.
Conclusion
The goal for contemporary leaders should not be to choose between macromanagement and micromanagement but to understand when each style is most appropriate. By focusing on macromanagement, leaders can ensure that their teams are empowered to make decisions and act independently, which is essential for fostering an innovative and resilient organisational culture.